Director: Marc Webb
Actors: Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Rhys Ifans
Rating: 2.5/5
There is a similarity between the tribals of Chhattisgarh and the studio that has produced ‘The Amazing Spiderman’ (TAS). Both seem to be desperately battling for survival. What else would explain the reboot of a franchise that began hardly a decade back and which, despite its best intentions has only regressed the original story?
The all too familiar story of Spiderman’s beginnings has undergone only cosmetic changes. His father is shown to have been working for Oscorp before he disappeared. His girlfriend is Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone) who is his first love in the comic books and not Mary Jane and her father is a cop. Spiderman inadvertently creates the monster he later fights. And Peter Parker/Spiderman (Andrew Garfield) lets both his girlfriend and her father know his secret identity.
The really amazing thing about this film is that this almost similar film to the 2002 version even got made... |
It is hence fun finding out why this film was made. Here are six probable reasons.
1. Peter Parker in the original franchisee got married and it was time to send him back to school. 2. If comic books can reboot from a Spiderman to ‘The Amazing Spiderman’, why can’t a film. 3. To help the Titanic of a sinking studio, stay afloat.
4. If kids can like Transformers, they will like anything that has special effects. 5. Girls hate lizards so every time the lizard guy comes up, girls will jump on the lap of their boyfriends who will create a word of mouth buzz. 6. The studio found a director whose last name was had some connection with spiders - Webb.
At its core level, one can describe this film as the template of the original Spiderman mixed with few scattered elements taken from various films. E.g. introduction of the concerned father of the girlfriend like in Twilight or have him make his own gadgets like Batman.
There are too many problems with the film to narrate. First is the story itself which does not have the emotional pull or the engagement of the original Spiderman. The characterisations are not handled properly and even Gwen ends up becoming just a pretty face without a mind or aspiration of her own.
Even the hesitant, love angle between Peter Parker and Gwen is not handled well. And many characters are left hanging without a conclusion, most notably that of Irrfan Khan. Despite being a brilliant actor he is hardly suited for this blink-and-miss role where he fumbles with his ascent.
One department where TAS does not fail, is its special effects. Considering the state of commercial cinema emanating from Hollywood, one can safely assume that this would be reason enough for the film to make a billion dollars globally.
TAS gets an early release in India. It is not hard to imagine why. Demographically India not only has the world’s largest number of teens, but also the worlds largest concentration of them, teens who have grown up ‘loving’ the brainless ‘Transformers’ series. The Indian angle with the presumably last minute introduction of Irfaan Khan is also meant to woo Indian audiences.
If reboot is what Hollywood was looking for, they could have done something much more interesting and fun. Maybe a kind of handheld camera, found footage film like you had in the underappreciated gem ‘Chronicle’ last year.
If quick reboot is the new flavour of Hollywood, one dreads to wonder what they will reboot next - Harry Potter and Twilight?
(This review was written for the wire service IANS)
I'm almost glad to see that there are no comments so far on this harsh review of a film i consider to be the greatest superhero film ive ever seen (perhaps next to batman returns). a lot of the issues this writer addresses are in fact not issues. first of all, the six reasons presented for rebooting the (in my mind underwhelming) spider-man saga as it was developing are all valid. second, there are plenty of other reasons. 1. tobey maguire
ReplyDeleteah whatever, this movie was amazing.